When can be manipulation software not a defeat device?
Source : When can be manipulation software not a defeat device?
VW has suggested that will, even if the item discovers its manipulation software was employed in European emissions testing, the item may not be illegal. How so?
Never features a news story made me so incredulous. although I’ve checked as well as also rechecked as well as also, yes, there can be a strong suggestion by VW that will the use of manipulation software in European emissions testing may not be illegal.
The argument appears to centre around whether the software constitutes a defeat device. European test regulations clearly state that will defeat devices are prohibited, although there are sub-clauses within the wording. Specifically, they read:
“The use of defeat devices that will reduce the effectiveness of emission control systems shall be prohibited. The prohibition shall not apply where:
“(a) the need for the device can be justified in terms of protecting the engine against damage or accident as well as also for safe operation of the vehicle;
“(b) the device does not function beyond the requirements of engine starting;
“(c) the conditions are substantially included from the test procedures for verifying evaporative emissions as well as also average tailpipe emissions.’
So far, I’ve had no further detail by VW, although I wonder if the item can be trying to claim that will the software was there for “protecting the engine against damage” or similar? At which point, even if they do discover the manipulation software was invoked in European NEDC testing, they will be able to claim that will they didn’t break any rules.
Regardless of whether VW can be right – as well as also I should stress that will the item claims not to even know yet whether the software was invoked during European tests – I find This specific an extremely troubling argument for the item to be pedalling.
VW has clearly admitted the item cheated in US tests using the same software. As a result, trying to nitpick its way through the European regulations as well as also out of trouble appears to me to be utterly outrageous – especially for a company from the middle of a maelstrom that will the item’s fresh boss has claimed the item will only emerge by by acting with honesty, transparency as well as also positive action. Slipping between the cracks of regulations might demonstrate none of those things to a car buying public looking for humility.
Just to recap, This specific can be what Matthias Müller said when he took the top job: “My most urgent task can be to win back trust for the Volkswagen Group – by leaving no stone unturned as well as also with maximum transparency, as well as drawing the right conclusions by the current situation. Under my leadership, Volkswagen will do everything the item can to develop as well as also implement the most stringent compliance as well as also governance standards in our industry.”
I simply cannot draw a straight line between those comments as well as also the suggestion that will the use of manipulation software could be excused, legal or otherwise.
VW’s slipperiness also raises a more troubling question. With the firm’s illegal actions already having opened a can of worms for the rest of the auto industry (deservedly or otherwise), This specific fresh argument returns the spotlight to every some other car maker that will has been forced to issue a statement in these recent weeks saying their cars fully comply with the regulations.
If VW can claim that will cars we know were fitted with manipulation software could legally use the item in European emissions tests, then we are surely back to square one again?
by via Autocar RSS Feed