Telematics Have Been Used At Court To Secure A Conviction
A speeding driver, Farid Reza, who killed a 21-year-old woman in Kingston, south west London, has been found guilty of Causing Death by Dangerous Driving in addition to Serious Injury at the Old Bailey where telematics data provided vital evidence in support of the police investigation.
Reza, 36, of Kingston was sentenced to 5 years in addition to 3 months in prison in what the judge described as a mindless act which resulted within the death of a young student.
Reza was also found guilty of causing Serious Injury after 5 children who were travelling in his car were injured.
Although CCTV evidence seized by Met Police investigators showed Reza was racing his BMW 330d M Sport against an identical style hire car driven by William Spicer aged 28 years, they were unable initially to prove the speed of either vehicle.
In what is actually becoming a common example of how technology in addition to connected cars are changing the way vehicle accidents are investigated, the Metropolitan Police recognised a key piece of supporting evidence was available through the telematics device fitted to Spicer’s BMW 330d M Sport.
Motor Insurance in addition to Road Traffic Collision investigators, Asset Protection Unit (APU) Ltd, were asked to analyse the telematics data in addition to provided the Metropolitan Police which has a precise timeline of events through vehicle events captured during the incident journey.
The CCTV evidence gathered through multiple building locations showed both cars were driving at speed towards the incident area, however they were travelling which has a constant distance between them at the incident location which enabled APU’s telematics expert to show Reza’s car must have been driven at least 69 miles per hour, the same speed as Spicer’s, moments before Reza hit pedestrian Hina Shamim.
The APU expert witness was also able to refute an allegation through Reza in which Spicer had collided with his vehicle causing him to lose control.
Neil Thomas, Director of Investigative Services at APU, said: “We recognise how devastating This particular incident has been to everyone involved in addition to send our condolences to Ms Shamim’s family in addition to friends. Accurate analysis of telematics data can be complex yet our expert witness was able to assist the Police investigation, in addition to present his testimony in a way which helped the Court in addition to the jury fully understand the incontrovertible in addition to unchallenged evidence through the Telematics device.”
Judge Richard Leon Marks said: “The evidence provided within the case was essential to assessing the speed of the driver in addition to the speed in which he was travelling – far over the speed limit – when he hit Shamim. The consequences to Shamim’s family are devastating in addition to no sentence I could give could begin to address or consolidate their feelings. I accept in which Reza’s remorse is actually genuine yet This particular was only him responsible for putting his foot down on the accelerator in which day.”
APU’s team of telematics in addition to anti-fraud experts is actually increasingly utilised by police forces in addition to insurance companies across the country to interrogate telematics data in addition to package This particular into usable evidence in court.
by Mr Butterscotch via Car Articles