Quickie Used Car Review – Honda City (2009-2014)

Saturday, August 19th, 2017 - autos, honda city, used car of the week, used car review

Quickie Used Car Review – Honda City (2009-2014)

Advertisement

2009-2014 Honda City

The Great: Huge Indoor space, reliable

The Bad: Rev demanding 1.3

The Say: High levels of quality trickled down to a sub-compact package.

Go For: 1.5 E
Avoid: 1.3 A

cost Range: P340,000-P550,000
Our Rating: ****

Full Review: Used Car Review – Honda City (2009-2014)
Latest vehicle profile: Honda City

See the different versions of This specific vehicle:
2009-2011
2012-2014

Vehicle Overview
Launched in 2009, the fifth generation Honda City got more sophisticated along with more better by offering fresh VTEC engines along that has a larger cabin. The previous design’s i-DSI engine along with rear folding bench was dropped for all types. A far cry by the hatchback types which were only previously available outside the Philippines during the 80s along with even by the Civic EF based design during the 90s.

While the outside dimensions increased a little, the story tells you the idea incorporates a larger cabin along with trunk space than before, explaining why the 60/40 fold rear seats were dropped. Similar to its rival, 1.5 types are easily distinguished by its side mirror signal repeaters than the 1.3 which don’t get these.

Honda’s VTEC technology is usually right now used for both engines here, which gave the 1.3 along with 1.5 more power along with torque than before. The 1.3 is usually too smallish which you need to rev hard to attain decent acceleration, while the 1.5 can motivate the vehicle without any drama. Handling is usually something Honda typical along with might bring you to your destination without any trouble. Unlike the previous design, the 1.5 is usually strictly automatic.

As we said earlier which the Indoor had grew up in size, especially which passengers have unobstructed view outside. Another plus point is usually the high quality Indoor, which is usually a breath of fresh air in This specific category.

What Should I Get
In 2009, the City was originally available in three variants which includes the A, S, along with E. Choosing the A (which was dropped inside 2012 update) gives you the 99hp 1.3 engine plus all power amenities, MP3 capability with CD, along with ABS brakes. Going for the S adds alloy wheels, dual airbags, alarm, keyless entry, along with auxilary along with USB function. The E adds the 118hp 1.5 engine, chrome door handles, along with side mirror signal repeaters. An ECO mode along with steering wheel audio controls for January 2012 along with up types. April 2013 saw the launch of two spin-off types of the E which included the EL which gets leather seats while the ENC gets stability control along with 60/40 fold rear seats. Modulo Centeng kits were an added option for 1.3 S along with 1.5 E types beginning December 2012.

How Much might the idea Cost Me
Maintaining one is usually inside range of its rivals along with there is usually no CVT to worry about. Fuel consumption is usually average for the class although the 1.3 automatic tends to rob power due to the rev friendly engine. Problem spots of This specific vehicle include a weak alternator, the starter system which makes starting the engine difficult especially when the vehicle is usually shut down for a short time, along with minor squeaks which can pop out. Different recalls were issued for the City which involved a spring which causes friction resulting to stalling or engine failure (for 1.5 types assembled between 2009 to April 2010, issued last February 2011) along with suspected defect inside driver side airbag’s deflator (2009 to 2011 assembled types issued last September 2015 along with 2012 to 2014 assembled types issued last March 2016).


Quickie Used Car Review – Honda City (2009-2014)

Source link : Quickie Used Car Review – Honda City (2009-2014)

Pictures gallery of Quickie Used Car Review – Honda City (2009-2014)

Advertisement
Quickie Used Car Review – Honda City (2009-2014) | admin | 4.5