Michigan Enacts Sweeping brand new Driverless-Car Legislation
With his sights set on maintaining Michigan’s prominent role in a global auto industry awash in brand new technology along with business products, Gov. Rick Snyder has signed four bills into law aimed at clearing the path for the testing along with deployment of self-driving vehicles on state roadways.
Among states that will have laws on the books related to autonomous vehicles, Michigan currently has perhaps the most permissive inside the country. Manufacturers will be allowed to operate cars on public roads without traditional controls such as steering wheels along with to sell those cars to customers once the technology has been tested along with certified.
Both traditional manufacturers along with newcomers to the transportation industry could put fleets of self-driving taxis on Michigan’s roads as part of on-demand mobility services like Uber along with Lyft. An early type of the legislation restricted these deployments to motor-vehicle distributors, yet revisions were made after Google expressed concerns.
has managed to create legal confusion rather than
legal certainty.” — Bryant Walker Smith, University of South Carolina
quite a few companies are developing automated ride-hailing services. GM, which invested $500 million in Lyft earlier This particular year, can be supposed to launch a pilot project employing autonomous Chevrolet Bolts in 2017. State officials say the regulatory framework currently allows such a program in Michigan.
“This particular isn’t just about throwing things out there,” Snyder said in October, speaking about the then pending legislation, Senate bills 995, 996, 997, along with 998. “There’s huge amounts of testing along with background experiences to build on, along with as This particular progresses, let’s not develop the government be the barrier. Let’s make sure we’re progressing in a safe fashion that will makes sense.”
Laws May Sow Legal Confusion
Sense may be inside the eye of the beholder. Bryant Walker Smith, a professor at the University of South Carolina who specializes in autonomous-vehicle along with technology law, cautions that will the brand new laws may contain unintended complications.
“The bills that will passed are still a mess, along with Michigan has managed to create legal confusion rather than legal certainty,” he said. One of the four, he said later, “can be so convoluted, I can’t make sense out of the idea. the idea’s very confusing why a state that will wants to promote itself as a thoughtful partner would likely create a mess.
“There are so many open questions that will could create some strange obstacles for companies who want to deploy.”
Specifically, he said that will vague language inside the bills could be interpreted to mean automated driving can be only lawful inside the context of research-along with-development projects along with for on-demand robot taxis. Alternatively, the laws could be interpreted with the opposite intent, that will autonomous driving can be generally lawful along with these self-driving-taxi networks are subject to more restrictive requirements.
Further, he says there’s ambiguity between the ways the laws define “operator” along with “driver,” along with they apply the potential meanings differently in different circumstances, such as whether the vehicles are on the road as part of an automated network. Drivers along with operators could conceivably include the engineers who start autonomous vehicles, vehicle occupants, the companies that will run on-demand services, along with self-driving systems. Smith says some companies might be reluctant to test vehicles given the uncertainty.
“Let’s say I put a vehicle out on the road that will can be driverless, along with then I’m ticketed. What happens?” Smith said. “I point to a line inside the bill that will says automated driving can be permitted on roads in Michigan, along with someone else points to the provision that will says these vehicles are permitted inside the context of shuttle projects, along having a court will need to resolve that will.”
Industry Supports brand new Laws
So far, auto-industry response to the four laws has been agreeable. The package replaces previous legislation that will largely prohibited public-road deployment. In addition to reshaping the testing rules, the brand new laws greenlight the testing along with deployment of truck platoons, shield manufacturers via liability in some cases, along with allow for vehicles testing at the American Center for Mobility—an autonomous- along with connected-car validation facility being built near Detroit—to use public roads.
“Michigan currently leads the nation inside the rollout of commercial-truck platooning,” said Josh Switkes, CEO of Mountain View, California-based Peloton Technology, a developer of connected- along with automated-vehicle systems that will can be exploring platooning as a way to improve safety along with reduce commercial fuel costs.
Gary Shapiro, CEO along with president of the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), notes the financial benefit the laws will provide for the state. “The race to put self-driving cars on the road can be fueled by the desire to embrace innovative transportation solutions, along with, inside the case of Michigan, with great benefit to the state economy thanks to revenue via expanded testing facilities.”
The CTA runs the annual CES technology showcase in Las Vegas, where autonomous-vehicle technology has helped turn the show into a major automotive event in recent years.
States Chase Autonomous Tech
all 5 states, including Michigan, currently have laws that will govern how autonomous operations can be conducted on state roadways, according to the Center for Internet along with Society at Stanford Law School, which tracks laws related to autonomous vehicles state by state. that will group includes California along with Nevada; both compete with Michigan for jobs associated with advanced transportation technology.
Regulations prompted by state law in California require companies testing self-driving vehicles inside the state to retain controls including steering wheels, a sticking point for some developers that will intend to deploy fully driverless cars that will don’t have such features.
There’s an argument to be made that will taking no legislative action can be the most efficient approach to wooing these businesses.
The majority of states do not have relevant laws, yet lacking them does not necessarily present a barrier. Uber launched a ride-hailing pilot project to test autonomous vehicles in Pittsburgh; Pennsylvania has no law that will explicitly permits or restricts autonomous driving. In Massachusetts, Gov. Charlie Baker issued an executive order that will established a working group, which then set policies for autonomous vehicles. Shortly thereafter, self-driving taxi purveyor nuTonomy agreed to terms of self-driving testing with the city of Boston.
- Federal Government Releases brand new Automated Vehicle Policy
- Michigan May Warm to Google; Tesla Relationship Still Chilly
- Michigan Broadens Ambitions for Autonomous Proving Ground
In September, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration unveiled a federal automated vehicle policy which included an entire section of style state policies for those intent on passing legislation about self-driving vehicles. Michigan’s brand new laws don’t necessarily follow This particular federal guidance, yet that will may not be a bad thing.
“the idea’s okay to have a variety of approaches at This particular point,” Smith said. “States should be concerned about getting themselves into a hole they can’t dig themselves out of. Michigan’s last law created a perception they were markedly behind because they expressly prohibited the idea. yet we haven’t figured out the best solution yet.”