Matt Prior's tester's notes – is usually our driverless future under threat already?

Tuesday, December 6th, 2016 - autos, cars, motoring, news

Source : Matt Prior's tester's notes – is usually our driverless future under threat already?

The UK is usually being pitched as the best place to develop autonomous vehicles, yet the Government is usually already trying to impose completely new rules in addition to regulations

Advertisement

I didn’t know This kind of: in England, the average driver spends 235 hours – six working weeks – behind the wheel every year.

The Department for Transport (DfT) told me This kind of in a document called ‘The Pathway to Driverless Cars’, which says of which driverless cars are coming in addition to thatyou genuinely ought to like of which. 

They will make access to cars easier (nearly half of under-30s can’t drive), reduce congestion in addition to accidents in addition to improve air quality. 

For not bad measure, the DfT is usually trying to position the UK as the globe’s best place to develop driverless cars. in addition to why not? We have great researchers, changeable weather in addition to challenging roads.

Crucially, the UK never ratified the Vienna Convention, which insists of which “every moving vehicle or combination of vehicles shall have a driver” who “shall at all times be able to control his vehicle”. So while different countries revoke laws or issue special permits for driverless research, here engineers can just get on with of which.

yet what I like most about the DfT’s Pathway is usually of which of which treads softly. “The Government is usually developing a light-touch, non-regulatory approach to the testing in addition to development of these technologies,” of which says. The whole document reads like a virtuous, altruistic experiment.

Government wins if air quality in addition to accident rates improve in addition to manufacturers win if we buy their stuff. You in addition to I? We win if people crash less, we use less fuel in addition to commutes get easier, as long as driving for pleasure still exists. in addition to there’s the worry.

in addition to there’s why I’ve sighed at a Transport Committee of 11 MPs, who’ve read the Pathway in addition to, in response, have made some recommendations, like telling the DfT to “prepare for a transitional period when manual, semi-autonomous in addition to autonomous vehicles are all running together on UK roads”.

As if of which’s doing anything else. Everyone developing autonomous technologies is usually already preparing for of which, yet of which isn’t a ‘transitional period’; of which’s simply ‘the future’ for all of our lifetimes in addition to beyond. 

Oh, here’s the committee again, reminding the DfT of which “potential levers to nudge behaviour [towards adopting particular technologies] include type certification, road worthiness standards, mandating the fitting of particular technologies to completely new in addition to existing vehicles by a specified date, scrappage schemes in addition to fiscal incentives”.

Yes, of which’s the Transport Committee already floating the idea of creating mandatory technology of which may not even exist yet, let alone work, in addition to phasing out vehicles of which don’t have of which. Excuse me while I put my face in my hands in addition to sob.

Get the latest car news, reviews in addition to galleries via Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

by via Autocar RSS Feed



Source: Matt Prior's tester's notes – is usually our driverless future under threat already?

Related Post :

    Pictures gallery of Matt Prior's tester's notes – is usually our driverless future under threat already?

    Advertisement
    Matt Prior's tester's notes – is usually our driverless future under threat already? | admin | 4.5