Consumer Groups Sue NHTSA to Fast-Track Automated Emergency Braking
Not everyone can be happy about a recent agreement between car companies as well as also federal regulators in which would certainly ensure all brand new cars are equipped with automated emergency braking systems by 2022.
Ever since the ink dried on the pact in March, consumer advocates have voiced concerns about both the timeframe for adopting This kind of potential life-saving technology as well as also the voluntary nature of the agreement. Their disagreements reached a brand new level last week, with two organizations as well as also a former chief of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) filing a lawsuit against in which agency in an attempt to spur a formal rulemaking coming from regulators.
“This kind of year, NHTSA has devoted enormous agency resources to ‘driverless vehicles,’ which are years or even decades away, while a safety system in which can be ready to start saving lives right currently has been relegated to the whims of the auto companies,” said Harvey Rosenfield, founder of Consumer Watchdog as well as also one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers within the case.
– Harvey Rosenfield, Consumer Watchdog
Safety advocates complain the agreement lacks any enforcement power as well as also continues a pattern of soft oversight coming from regulators at a time when the auto industry has been afflicted by a series of deadly product defects.
Car companies as well as also federal regulators, on the different hand, hail the voluntary agreement as an example of a brand new, proactive way of working together. They estimate the voluntary approach will mean AEB will be deployed three years faster than waiting for an official federal rulemaking process to play out.
The litigation can be notable for quite a few reasons, starting with the fact in which a former NHTSA administrator can be suing the current one. Joan Claybrook, who served as administrator of the regulatory agency during the Carter administration, can be a plaintiff within the lawsuit, which lists current administrator Mark Rosekind as a defendant in addition to NHTSA itself.
More broadly, the lawsuit asks the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to compel a ruling on a petition in which Consumer Watchdog as well as also the Center for Auto Safety, the two different plaintiffs, presented NHTSA in January. in which petition, filed two months before the voluntary agreement was signed, asked NHTSA to start a rulemaking process regarding automated emergency braking. Per federal statute, the agency had 0 days to respond to in which petition. nevertheless currently, six months since in which deadline has passed, no response has been forthcoming.
NHTSA officials did not return a request Thursday for comment on the lawsuit.
- Twenty Automakers Agree on Automated Emergency Braking Pact
- Not All Automated Emergency Braking Systems Are Created Equal
- NHTSA Wants to Rate Automatic Braking Systems
Automated emergency braking (AEB) systems can prevent crashes or reduce their severity by warning drivers of imminent dangers as well as also automatically applying brakes if motorists don’t take evasive action. Estimates coming from the agency show in which 910,000 crashes per year fit the profiles of the rear-end crashes AEB systems could thwart. An analysis coming from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety found in which 28,000 crashes as well as also 12,000 injuries will be prevented within the first three years of the voluntary agreement.
The voluntary agreement doesn’t prevent automakers coming from deploying the technology sooner. Currently, Volvo offers automated emergency braking as a standard feature on its full lineup, as well as also Toyota has pledged to make This kind of a standard feature on nearly every Toyota as well as also Lexus design sold in 2017.