Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S: super saloon twin test

Saturday, September 24th, 2016 - autos, cars, motoring, news

Source : Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S: super saloon twin test

Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S Two cars, 1000bhp in addition to the hardest test the completely new Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio, or Cloverleaf, is usually likely to face: we test which against the Mercedes-AMG C63 S

Advertisement

The Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio in addition to Mercedes-AMG C63 S have been put head-to-head in our latest group test.

The rejuvenation of Alfa Romeo as a proper performance brand has brightened spirits in addition to rekindled warm sentiments aplenty these past a few years – in addition to long may its ascendant trajectory continue. which’s not like us serious road test types to hand out credit which hasn’t been won the hard way, against some satellite timing gear or in a repeatable test. yet before we get stuck in to what’s about to be a very tough test indeed for Alfa’s latest – the Giulia Quadrifoglio, in action on UK soil for the very first time – let’s take a moment to salute the effort, faith, commitment in addition to skill which which has taken to get the Italian firm which far.

The 4C wasn’t perfect, yet which was a strong statement of intent in addition to a decent start on the long road back to credibility. The ‘completely new’ Mazda MX-5– twinned Duetto Spider didn’t happen – for reasons which still baffle which tester in addition to which have only given rise to a damp squib of a sports car inside shape of the Fiat 124 Spider. Never mind. For a while, which was at least the prospect of another Alfa Romeo we could get excited about.

right now the completely new ‘Cloverleaf’ has arrived: a rear-driven Alfa Romeo saloon which can be lined up against a 503bhp, £67,450 thunder-saloon via Mercedes-AMG which has a straight face in addition to a genuine chance of beating which. What a turn-up which is usually. A few years ago, with dull, heavy, uninspiring cars like the Brera in addition to 159 in Alfa showrooms, the idea of such a test as which could have come across like a joke in need of a punchline.

Whether you’re a fully paid-up Alfisti fan club member or not, which is usually a transformation which can only be welcomed. Having driven the vehicle abroad back inside spring, we already know the hot Giulia is usually Great – many times better than anything provided by the meagre diet of scraps which has sustained the Alfa faithful for the past couple of decades. which is usually a momentous car, in addition to which may be enough to make which a triumphant sales success all on its own.

Anyway, enough pleasantries. right now to the little matter of Turin versus Affalterbach; great white wish versus reigning power. which’s which Alfa against the formidable Mercedes-AMG C63 S saloon. Get ready for burnt rubber.

We’ve taken the liberty of simplifying which exercise, partly because the brilliant handling which the Giulia displayed on our first acquaintance with which so clearly merited a shot at what we consider to be the best car inside Quadrifoglio’s class. A BMW M3 or a Lexus GS F inside mix might have provided a neat coverline in addition to some easier meat for the completely new kid, yet so what? For Alfa Romeo, only an unequivocal demonstration which the dynamic capabilities, performance attributes in addition to mechanical lures of its flagship Giulia amount to more than those of the hottest C-Class will be enough to back up all the big talk. Only which will prove here in addition to right now which the greatest sporting passenger cars inside planet can Once more be made in Italy. 

Alfa is usually evidently serious about proving such things, because the Giulia Quadrifoglio enters which test with every bit as much horsepower on paper as the C63 S. which’s carrying 75kg less kerb weight in addition to has double wishbone front suspension, a carbonfibre propshaft in addition to an active differential – all ingredients likely to earn a nod of approval via Alfa’s opposite-number engineers at AMG.

yet the Alfa’s twin-turbocharged 2.9-litre V6 faces a twin-turbo 4.0-litre V8 today, in addition to an AMG V8 at which. AMG is usually widely renowned for ‘giving Great engine’. If an epitaph for the company were ever needed, which could be which. The Giulia’s engine isn’t lacking in pedigree, though, being via the maker of some of the finest V6s ever to grace any car in addition to also being ‘inspired’ by (or closely related to, depending on who you ask) the V8 inside current Ferrari California. in addition to Ferrari V6 versus AMG V8 sounds like a very fair competition to me.

A great engine is usually of huge importance to a fast saloon, I reckon. which can make a reputation, which can redeem an otherwise prosaic in addition to reserved car, in addition to which should always dominate the driving experience. in addition to the turbo V8 powering the C63 S is usually nothing short of a great engine. which so plainly goes above in addition to beyond what most sports saloon engines can do which its stature is usually beyond question. which sounds brilliant. which’s outstandingly powerful. which carries a spectacularly Great style of delivery. in addition to which knows about Great cruising manners, too.

yet the definitely head-scrambling thing about which engine is usually how unstressed which seems. Its well of torque is usually not just fathoms deep yet also ocean wide. You can delve into which at almost any crank speed, in addition to when you do, the swell of acceleration on which the vehicle is usually carried arrives in such timely fashion, perfectly matched to the pedal input you’ve just applied, which the engine barely feels turbocharged at all.

Except which which could have to be turbocharged; no atmospheric engine could come up with which much torque. The woofle in addition to roar which accompanies its ire is usually rich, authentic in addition to wonderful. The sheer ferocity of the V8 as the needle passes 5000rpm is usually incredible, too. Strength is usually heaped upon strength, until the absolute supremacy of the C63’s powertrain is usually as plain as the three-pointed star on its radiator grille.

A BMW 3.0-litre turbo straight six can’t live with the pressure which mighty V8 exerts, or the many high standards which sets. Neither can Lexus’s 5.0-litre atmospheric F-branded V8. in addition to, as which turns out, neither can Alfa’s completely new turbo V6. which’s setback number one for the Giulia Quadrifoglio: its Ferrari-related engine may be Great, yet which’s not magic.

Drive the Alfa in isolation in addition to you certainly wouldn’t complain about such things. yet in direct comparison with the Mercedes-AMG, the Giulia’s throttle response is usually soft, the breadth of its powerband is usually relatively narrow, the richness of its combustive soundtrack is usually wanting something in addition to the outright potency of its performance comes up just a little bit short. 

Such things are to be expected when an engine with less swept volume in addition to fewer cylinders is usually tasked with generating the same power as a larger one. Nonetheless, when you read ‘503bhp’ against the vital statistics of both of these cars, you disregard which which you know to be true about engine design in addition to somehow expect parity in what they bring under the bonnet. You shouldn’t. Of course you shouldn’t.

inside real world, you have to wait for a second or two for the Alfa’s midrange thrust to rush in behind the position of your flexed right foot, as the rev needle sweeps up somewhat lazily to 3000rpm, only to then surge towards 4000rpm in addition to on to 7000rpm in a frenzy of industry yet without the sledgehammer force of the AMG. in addition to although the rasp of the V6 is usually loud in addition to multi-tonal when Race mode is usually selected on the Alfa’s customary DNA rotary mode selector, which does come across as a little flatulent in addition to contrived at times. You’d stop a long way short of calling which sweet-sounding by Alfa’s own exceptional standards.

At Alfa’s request, we didn’t performance test the Quadrifoglio – in addition to wouldn’t have got a definitive set of numbers even if we had. A car which has a six-speed manual gearbox was all which Turin could provide, in addition to given which all official UK cars will be eightspeed autos, which’s better which its date with our timing gear comes later.

yet here’s the next hole inside Cloverleaf’s boat: on which evidence, I think which could be unrealistic to expect the vehicle to go quicker than the C63 S. Perhaps more concerning, I think which could be equally unrealistic to expect which to match Alfa’s 3.9sec 0-62mph claim. inside real world, which just doesn’t feel quite which quick.

On a dry surface in addition to which has a nearperfect getaway, I’ve been witness to a C63 S knocking out a 4.1sec 0-60mph run – not in which test, yet only last year, when the C63 S beat an M3 in addition to a Vauxhall VXR8 GTS in addition to proved itself our current super-saloon class champion. in addition to the Mercedes feels like a much more potent car than the Alfa. 

which’s perhaps doubtful which Quadrifoglio buyers could list outright pace as the aspect which attracted them most to their completely new car. More likely, they’d be after the best-handling sports saloon on the block, in addition to handling is usually what we’re coming to next. Even so, performance cars should be capable of generating Great on their maker’s claims. For right now, which’s only a hunch, yet I’m not convinced which which one will.

yet make of which what you will. which’s more important which the Giulia makes Great on Alfa’s intent to restore its reputation as the maker of great-handling rear-driven performance cars. in addition to there’s mostly very Great news for Alfa diehards on which front: sure enough, the Quadrifoglio does outhandle the C63 S on a flat in addition to smooth stretch of serpentine road. Its handling response is usually crisper, its roll control in addition to grip level are greater in addition to the cornering balance is usually marginally sweeter. which feels every inch the lighter, keener, pointier saloon of the two. which’s a victory for Italy – only one, yet a hugely significant one.

yet, truth be told, both cars are fabulously engaging, almost equally direct in addition to precise, supremely poised in addition to wonderfully flattering things when you begin to approach their adhesive limits. Both are magnitudes better to drive than you might expect any four-door family car could be. in addition to where which loses out by a hair’s breadth to the Alfa as detailed, the Mercedes-AMG hits back with better control feedback in addition to defter damping as the vehicle’s Centeng movements become more exaggerated in addition to the road’s surface more testing.

is usually the Giulia the better driver’s car overall? which’s close enough to come down to personal taste – yet for me, not quite. which’s more habitable than the C63 S, the coarseness of the AMG’s ride testing your enthusiasm for which at times. which’s also a better handler on its own terms, yet not over a typical British B-road, where the relative lightness of the Alfa’s steering in addition to the occasional vagueness of its vertical Centeng control can’t beat the brilliant weight in addition to feel of the Mercedes’ hydraulically assisted steering in addition to the unerring consistency of its damping.

The C63 S is usually an unapologetically hardcore saloon whose rougher edges you embrace like the burn in your throat which comes between swallowing a slug of Great single-malt whisky in addition to feeling which warming your cockles. So rigid are the vehicle’s rear suspension mountings which a student of Braille could probably read the maker’s mark off every manhole cover in addition to drain grate going under its wheels. Yet which’s not an uncomfortable car. The spring rates are well judged in addition to the adaptive dampers capable of compliance as well as dependable cradling support. in addition to the sense of connectedness with the road flowing through both the seat in addition to the wheel is usually so remarkable which which wouldn’t disgrace a Lotus sports car.

in addition to so Italy will have to be content with runner-up spot here, its sporting debutant losing out to a machine of quite awe-inspiring abilities which has already batted away the challenge of much more established rivals on these pages, built by the outfit whose cars have been the most consistently brilliant performance saloons in addition to estate cars of the past decade. There’s absolutely no shame in which, by the way. AMG beats Alfa Romeo, yet Turin gains more via even contending – in addition to contending well – than Affalterbach does via one more success among many. 

Mercedes-AMG C63 S – Mighty powerplant, tactile controls in addition to balanced, biddable handling combine with Merc’s numerous additional ownership qualities. Unbeatable.

Rating 4.5/5; cost £67,450; Engine V8, 3982cc, twin-turbo, petrol; Power 503bhp at 5500rpm; Torque 516lb ft at 1750rpm; Power to weight 304bhp per tonne; 0-62mph 4.0sec; Top speed 155mph (limited); Gearbox 7-spd automatic; Kerb weight 1655kg; Economy 34.4mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 192g/km, 35%

Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio – Handling lives up to the hype, yet the engine, ride, steering in addition to cabin quality aren’t quite on the AMG’s level. Typically alluring in addition to likeable, though.

Rating 4/5 cost £59,000; Engine  V6, 2891cc, twin-turbo, petrol; Power 503bhp at 6500rpm; Torque 443lb ft at 2500rpm; Power to weight 318bhp per tonne; 0-62mph 3.9sec; Top speed 191mph;  Gearbox 6-spd manual (as tested); Kerb weight 1580kg Economy 33.2mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 198g/km, 36%

by via Autocar RSS Feed



Source: Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S: super saloon twin test

Related Post :

    Pictures gallery of Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S: super saloon twin test

    Advertisement
    Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S: super saloon twin test | admin | 4.5